Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 25:02 — 34.4MB)
For regular Gnostics Insights, subscribe here. Apple Podcasts | Amazon Music | TuneIn | Deezer | RSS
Welcome back to Gnostic Insights. The big day has finally arrived! The book is ready. It’s in publication. It will be posted on Amazon for sale. The soonest they’ll get it up for me is on the 28th of August. That’s Wednesday, the 28th of August. You’ll be able to buy the paperback version of A Simple Explanation of the Gnostic Gospel for only $24. That’s the least I’m allowed to sell it for by Amazon. So, meanwhile, as a bonus, I did format the book as an e-book, and it is already posted. So if you were to go to Amazon now, you would be able to buy the e-book of A Simple Explanation of the Gnostic Gospel for only $9. It’s available today for $9, or you can wait until Wednesday and get it for $24. A Simple Explanation of the Gnostic Gospel (A Simple Gnostic Gospel) – Kindle edition by Ropp, Cyd , Ropp, Cyd, Puett, Bill. Religion & Spirituality Kindle eBooks @ Amazon.com.
And later this week, I will also format the book as a glorious, very expensive hardback, and I will release the hardback for the least amount of money that Amazon makes me release it for. I don’t know what that will be just yet until it’s formatted. But the hardback will differ from the paperback in that the hardback will be on the top quality high-gloss paper with the top quality ink and a hardback binding. Probably twice as much as the paperback sells for. I don’t know how these things work. We’ll see. I’ve already ordered the copies that I will sign and mail to the people who have contributed the $50 donation that I appreciate so much. And those are in the mail to me already as author preview copies. So you’ll be able to get those very soon as well.
This week, I’m going to talk about some philosophers, mathematicians, logicians, and their faith in the Father. Because so often people accuse us believers of being irrational, of being ignorant and foolish. And I want to tell you that that isn’t true. Indeed, you know, we follow the Father above. And remember, His emissary is Logos, which means logic and reason. So it is not unreasonable to believe in the eternal life and to believe in the Father and the ethereal plane. It’s based upon reason. The Father is love, but Logos is logic and reasonableness. And we need both in our lives—love and reason.
Reason without love is a modern and postmodern condition. It privileges supposedly reasonable logical assumptions and actions, but without believing in the Father and without the love of God to guide your heart in truth and faith, caring and compassion. We have to meld reason with love. Otherwise, it very easily turns into dictatorships and totalitarian rule.
This week, an essay posted on Noema magazine online by Nathan Gardels had a quote from Erwin Schrodinger. Erwin Schrodinger, the pioneering quantum physicist, postulated that “consciousness is a fundamental feature, the fabric of the universe, parceled out through the individuated experience of awareness.” Schrodinger was no lightweight when it comes to thinking.
Now, to counterpose that, the opposite of that is materialism—is not believing that consciousness is the ground state of the universe. Gerald Edelman, a Nobel neurobiologist considered the most prominent materialist in the field, believed consciousness is “entirely a function of embodiment.” In other words, that consciousness is a byproduct of the gray portion of our brains. This is generally what neurobiologists think. That’s why they can treat animals with such cruelty and have such disregard to any living things, because they don’t believe they are conscious. They usually think consciousness arises from the more complex neurobiology of the human condition.
But Schrodinger wrote in his essay that “the total number of minds in the universe is one. In fact, consciousness is a singularity phasing within all beings. Consciousness cannot be accounted for in physical terms, for consciousness is absolutely fundamental.” That was a quote from this NOEMA magazine that is posted online, and the name of the article is Who Knows What Consciousness Is?
I’ve been feeling for some time that I should share with you Blaise Pascal and his idea that’s called Pascal’s Wager. Have you ever heard of Pascal’s Wager? Now, I have a true believer attitude towards the Father. However, I must admit that Pascal’s Wager has often come to mind during my lifetime over the course of 70 years. I often think of Pascal’s Wager, and so to me it’s pretty important to share it with you. I’ve hesitated sharing it with you because, well, it kind of seems like a fallback position rather than just going straight for believing in the Father and the gnosis that comes from the Father, because this is a like a fail-safe fallback. Pascal’s Wager basically says that you have nothing to lose by believing in God, and you have everything to gain. So let me explain some of this to you.
By the way, I’m sometimes kind of shy about sharing the fact that I’m a Christian, that I believe in Jesus. You know, when I first started reading the Nag Hammadi scriptures and the Tripartite Tractate, as I’ve mentioned, I set it aside for five years. I had thoroughly read and highlighted, notated and diagrammed the Nag Hammadi, and pretty much came up with everything that I present now in my teaching and in my books, but it frightened me because I did not want to be accused of being a false prophet or a false teacher. I do not want to have the accusations of leading people astray. I would not want to lead anyone into hell. Obviously, that would be the farthest thing from my thought.
And by now, as a Gnostic, I don’t even think that hell is an accurate depiction of what happens to people who don’t believe at the time of death. A truly loving God and eternal punishment are inconsistent. What we humans call “justice” cannot override the love of God and the redemption from sin through Christ. The Lake of Fire is not eternal and everlasting. The Lake of Fire is Aeonic purging; that is the more accurate translation of the Coptic Greek in which the New Testament was written. In the original Greek, the word that has been translated as “eternal” is aionios, aeonic, and aeonic can either refer to a period of time or as relating to the Aeons of the Fullness. Two previous episodes of Gnostic Insights cover this concept in detail; you can listen or read about it by clicking on links in this transcript to Aeons, Not Ages and Overcoming Death-Follow the Light. So, it’s a purging fire to purge away our false beliefs and our meme shroud that has deluded us in our lifetime. The Lake of Fire is a cleansing. It’s a baptism. And the more unbelief you hold, the more incorrect memes you have enshrouded your Self with, the more purging there is to be done when you cross over. And that’s very unpleasant. I would not want to lead anyone into that kind of purging. And I myself, if I were a big false teacher, false prophet here, I’d have a lot to account for when I cross over. And I do not want to bring that upon my Self.
I am hoping that I spread the truth and the love of the Father. So something that occasionally crosses my mind and gives me pause is that it’s all well and good for me to share the Gnostic gospel with you and to present this alternative cosmology and cosmogony of the ethereal realm that differs from what is translated into the Old and New Testament. It’s all well and good for me because I’m a born again Christian. I have been saved. I am going to heaven. And I know that as a certainty.
But what about you? If you don’t have that certainty, if you are not born again, what if I lead you into error through the Gnostic gospel and you don’t have true belief in Christ as your fallback position? Well, then that’s the worst possible thing. So that is what I am attempting to avoid. And it sometimes niggles at me that it’s well and good for me to talk about the Gnostic gospel because I am saved. I am a born again Christian baptized in the Holy Spirit and have a surety of faith in heaven because I’m under the wing of Christ. But what about you if you’re not? What if you haven’t accepted Christ? What if you are not a believer in Jesus? What if you’re not a Christian and you, instead, go straight to the Gnostic gospel? Are you in danger? I don’t think so. But in the spirit of Blaise Pascal, I want to share some of this information with you today, and then you can make your own logical and reasonable choice for Christ.
So, you know, I do listen to Christian radio preachers, and I heard this one this week from the Colson Center on the life and faith of Blaise Pascal in their little five-minute show called Breakpoint. And I thought, aha, okay, well now it’s time for me to share with you Pascal’s Wager. So first I’m going to read a few paragraphs from this Breakpoint piece, and then I’ll share with you some words directly out of Pascal’s Pensées, as they’re called. Quoting now,
“On August 19, 1662, French philosopher, mathematician, and apologist Blaise Pascal died at just 39 years old. Despite his shortened life, Pascal is renowned for pioneering work in geometry, physics, and probability theory, and even for inventing the first mechanical calculator.
His most powerful legacy, however, is his pensées, or thoughts, about life’s biggest questions, including God and the human condition. Pascal’s intellect garnered attention at an early age. At age 16, he produced an essay on the geometry of cones, so impressive that René Descartes initially refused to believe that a 16-year-old child could have written it.
Later, Pascal advanced the study of vacuums and essentially invented probability theory. His life radically changed the evening of November 23, when Pascal experienced God’s presence in a powerful way. He immediately and radically reoriented his life and thinking toward God.
He described the experience on a scrap of parchment that he sewed into his jacket and carried with him the rest of his life. From that moment, Pascal dedicated his life to serving God through his writing. His ideas on apologetics were collected and published after his death in a volume entitled Pensées, or Thoughts.
[Pensées is a French word, the English translation is thoughts.] Best known of his ideas is Pascal’s Wager, and here is how it goes. Facing uncertainty in a game of life with such high stakes, he argued, it makes far more sense to believe in God’s existence than to not.
If you gain, you gain all. If you lose, you lose nothing. Wager, then, without hesitation, that He is.”
So, in other words, the stakes are very high, especially if you don’t believe in God and you’re wrong about that, then you will face, he thought, eternal damnation. But I would say you will face the chastening fire of the Aeons, and that is a very humbling and painful experience that burns off all those wrong memes that you’re holding to make you pure enough, you see, to enter eternity. Because none of the negative things that we generate or are exposed to down here on earth can pass on with us into eternity, obviously. Do you see that? Because the ethereal plane is pure and good. There is no sin or darkness on the ethereal plane, even by definition. If you can’t grasp that concept, take it as a definition of what heaven and eternity is about—no negativity, no lies, no deceit, no cheating, no wrongheaded notions, no anger. It’s all the opposite of that. It’s the virtuous side—vice down here, virtue up above.
The more we live a virtuous life down here, the less we have to account for and burn away in Judgment Day, you see, when we get to the other side. The more you dwell in darkness and hate the light and all of the wrong memes that attach because of that, then when you die, and you know you’re going to die, that’s a certainty, what you don’t know is what happens after death.
So what Pascal said was, well, just bet on it. If you’re living a bad life down here, and by bad, make your own definition of that. I don’t need to tell you that you are living a bad life if you are. You know that because you feel hollow. And on your deepest, darkest nights, you cry out because you are miserable. You know that.
So when you cross over to the other side in that state of unbelief, you have a lot to account for. Pascal thought you would go to hell because that’s what people thought. That’s what your conventional Christians think now. But we Gnostic Christians believe that you will not go to hell for eternity, but that you will face the chastening—the truth of your incorrect thoughts down here and your incorrect behaviors and all of the harm that you’ve done, if you don’t have the protection of the Christ vouching for you. And that’s what Christ does for us. He vouches for us. He puts his arms around us after we cross over, and he presents us to the Father, and he says, He’s with me. Forgive him, for he didn’t realize what he was doing. She’s with me. Forgive her. And then we pass through with Christ, because we’re part of Him. We take on his righteousness.
So the wager is that if you’re wrong, you will have a bad reckoning on the other side. But if you come to believe in Christ now, and Jesus was the emissary of the Christ here on earth, Jesus is the embodiment in human form of the Christ who came here in order to take us by the hand and lead us home, in order to say, It’s okay. Come along with me, and I’ll help you cross over without the pain, guilt, and recrimination of Judgment Day.
That’s what believing in Jesus now does for you, because you could step out of your door and get hit by a car and be dead, and then you didn’t have any more time to think about it. So Pascal said the wager is this: If you don’t believe in Christ now, then you will certainly have a Judgment Day. Or if you don’t believe in Christ now, at least you’ll have a miserable life here on earth, because you don’t have that assurance of salvation. You don’t have the love and compassion of Christ walking with you. You don’t have a happy ending to look forward to.
But if you’re right, if you do believe in Christ now, this is the other side of the wager. If you bet on God, if you bet on Christ, then you’ll have a better life now. You’ll have the assurance of salvation and belief in Christ and belief in the Father. You’ll be happier because you will put aside the vices and begin to adopt the virtues. And a virtuous life is a happy life, a truly virtuous life. So it’s a win-win situation to believe in Christ now. You have a happier life, and when you cross over to the other side, you escape the self-torment of recrimination over every bad thing you’ve ever done. So there’s no downside to believing in Christ.
And if you’re wrong—let’s say you believe in Christ now, and it turns out not to be true. Let’s say you believe in Christ now and you believe in the Father, but you’re wrong. You were just a foolish person, hoping for something that never was going to happen. Okay, but meanwhile you’ve had a happy life, and when you die, you’re no worse off. Poof! You’ve gone into oblivion. Where’s the downside? You see? But if you don’t believe in the Christ, and you’re wrong, then you do suffer the lousy life and the torment after you die. So that’s the basic wager.
Pascal also accurately described the moral condition of human beings. And he said, for example,
“We hate truth and those who tell it to us, and we like them to be deceived in our favor.” He also observed that, “People tend to distract themselves from the reality of death, but when our diversions run their course, we feel nothingness.”
Well, that’s all I’m quoting from the Colson article, but then I went into Pascal’s pensées, which are public domain, so you can download them for free, and I read more of Pascal’s words, and they’re really fabulous, and they’re especially fabulous for us Gnostics. I should devote more time, I think, to Pascal’s writing.
Here’s something that he said, for example:
“When I consider the short duration of my life, swallowed up in the eternity before and after, the little space which I fill and even can see, engulfed in the infinite immensity of spaces of which I am ignorant and which I know not, I am frightened and am astonished at being here rather than there, for there is no reason why here rather than there, why now rather than then. Who has put me here? By whose order and direction have this place and time been allotted to me?’
Now, here’s a quote from his pensées, verse 222, directed to atheists. He says,
“What reason have they for saying that we cannot rise from the dead? What is more difficult—to be born or to rise again? That what has never been should be or that what has been should be again? Is it more difficult to come into existence than to return to it? Habit makes the one appear easy to us. Want of habit makes the other impossible. A popular way of thinking.”
Pascal is speaking of resurrection of the dead upon Christ’s return in this previous passage, but he could just as easily be speaking of returning to our Aeonic home above in the Fullness when he speaks of “what has been should be again.” He goes on to say,
“Why cannot a virgin bear a child? Does a hen not lay eggs without a cock? What distinguishes these outwardly from others? And who has told us that the hen may not form the germ as well as the cock? What have they to say against the resurrection and against the child bearing of the virgin? Which is the more difficult, to produce a man or an animal or to reproduce it?”
And I think we could apply that same reasoning to reincarnation.
You see, if you are not of a mind that considers these sorts of things, you surely cannot criticize those of us who do. Because here you are, you’re alive, you’re thinking. Where’d that come from? What were you before? How did that arise really? There’s actually no scientific explanation for consciousness arising from the material. It still takes a leap of faith to believe in that. And then it’s a lot harder. There’s a lot more extremely improbable to the point of impossibility things that have to occur to evolve the human brain to a place where consciousness arises. Why believe in that any more than to say consciousness is the ground state of reality and that we pre-exist or that we go on after this body passes away?
We’re coming to the end of this week’s episode. Let me quote directly out of the pensées again about Pascal’s wager. He said,
“Let us examine then this point and say God is or he is not. But to which side shall we incline? You must wager. It is not optional. You are embarked. Which will you choose then? Let us see.
Since you must choose, let us see which interests you least. You have two things to lose—the true and the good—and two things to stake—your reason and your will, your knowledge and your happiness. And your nature has two things to shun—error and misery. Let us weigh the gain and the loss in wagering that God is. Let us estimate these two chances.
If you gain, you gain all. If you lose, you lose nothing. Wager then without hesitation that He is.”
So think back to the beginning of this episode and to all of the intelligence and logic that came before Pascal gained his faith when he had his epiphany of the Father. These are not mental lightweights, Pascal or Schrodinger. Trust for a moment that they’re right.
Onward and upward. And God bless us all.